'Crufts murder' mystery moves to the Continent

Well there's a thing. Jagger the Irish setter murdered by someone who knew their dogs with a slow-release poison at Crufts turns out to have been killed by a fast-acting pesticide at home in Belgium.
Congratulations to the Times for putting this piece of intellgence on the front page, coupled with a reasonably prominent right-hand page lead.
Last Monday the Times found itself in the sole company of the Daily Star in declining to use Jagger's photograph on the front page. Today it is the only paper to give him the prime slot. 
Everyone had a lot to say about the death of Jagger last week, as well they might, given that it was supposed to have been precipitated at the world's premier dog show. The story made the splash for the Mirror and Sun and while the Times preferred Paloma Faith for its front-page picture, there was plenty of room for Jagger's demise inside.

The Guardian and Telegraph put the story on page three, the Independent and Express on five, and the Mail gave it a spread on 4 and 5.

The Mirror and Mail, below, were so enamoured of the story that they gave it more big licks the next day - reporting that up to six dogs may have been poisoned and that Jagger may not have been the only one to die. The Telegraph, which had been the first to report that two other dogs had been taken ill, also put it on the front on day two.

There's no doubt that the death of a Crufts competitor the day after the show was a good story and a serious story. There was nothing wrong with the scale of the coverage, only with the lack of scepticism. The two sheepdogs who were supposed to have been taken ill sounded a bit like bandwagon jumping. The idea that a mad poisoner was going round targeting dogs willy-nilly stretched credulity, but if it were true, it was an even more serious story. 
But, as Gameoldgirl noted last week, something didn't feel right. There were too many contradictory theories being bandied about by the owners and breeders - even allowing for their understandable distress. As an onlooker it seems as though they were desperately firing scattershot in search of an explanation that would not point to any negligence on their part and Crufts got caught in the crossfire.
So now we know that Jagger could not have been poisoned at the show, how have the papers reported it today? Here are the cuttings:

Not bad really. Apart from the Independent, most gave the story some prominence, albeit further back in the book than the original, as you'd expect. But there are no comments from the owners or breeders. There is also a cutting missing from the collection above. Mail Online put the story up live yesterday evening. I've been through the paper several times but am blowed if I can find it in the print edition. Can anyone help me on that?

And while we're talking dogs, whatever happened to that petition about the supreme champion?
Gameoldgirl: Red setters and red herrings